Version 3.01

Rating:        Based on 29 ratings
Reviewed:  26 reviews
Downloads: 193918
Released: Jan 31, 2010
Updated: Feb 1, 2010 by rpowers119
Dev status: Stable Help Icon

Recommended Download

Application SDK_Binaries.zip
application, 385K, uploaded Feb 1, 2010 - 111204 downloads

Other Available Downloads

Source Code SDK_Source.zip
source code, 31214K, uploaded Feb 1, 2010 - 20194 downloads
Documentation Documentation.zip
documentation, 12191K, uploaded Feb 1, 2010 - 25537 downloads
Example Samples.zip
example, 2619K, uploaded Feb 1, 2010 - 36983 downloads

Release Notes

No new functionality. Added code attribution for Facebook UI ASP.NET controls.

Reviews for this release

     
merhaba.dsadsafsasdf
by cryptrorg on Feb 12, 2013 at 2:07 PM
     
This project's last release was 12 months ago. Use the retooled C# Facebook SDK at http://facebooksdk.codeplex.com/
by abepachikara on Dec 29, 2010 at 6:13 AM
     
I would not trust my life on this API based on the consulting group who created and maintains this API. They are known for producing and leaving a pile wherever they go. Also I noticed that v3.0.1 only has 27 ratings and ratings are turned off? hmm, smells to me.
by CoffeeAddict on Nov 17, 2010 at 2:38 AM
     
This API is great. For anyone having problems, I recommend referencing the http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js file and then modifying the source to read from the new cookie (fbs_<appkey>). Also make sure that the FB.Init call uses the Json-type syntax FB.init({ appId: '<appid>', status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true });. I'm sure I'll find more stuff, but so far the fixes look easy.
by mim1979 on Oct 15, 2010 at 4:35 AM
     
what is wrong with this product??? is this some joke? every where on the internet there are 1000's of people crying about the "incorrect signature" error.... and this from 3 years ago till today. I still get this problem and this makes this product UNUSABLE! and nowhere is there a solution it seems. Why dont this get addressed properly in all the different versions?
by bcweed on Oct 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM
     
there needs to be a better option. this one needs a lot of work -- documentation and organization.
by ubrew on Oct 5, 2010 at 11:07 PM
     
Excellent API, great job ! Just improve the samples please
by Galaad on Aug 25, 2010 at 7:50 PM
     
Have to agree with Hiawatha. Stuck in a loop where my IsConnected() always returns false. It's kind of a pain and I've spent a day and a half on just this one problem.
by davewms10 on Aug 4, 2010 at 5:10 PM
     
This API is a joke. The samples don't work, it just creates an endless loop clicking the Sign-in button and it never actually signs on. The cookies look fine, but IsConnected() just returns false. Of course there's no exceptions, nothing in any log, and no documentation to be of any assistance in the least.
by Hiawatha on Jul 14, 2010 at 8:14 AM
     
The documentation not show the pages.
by priore on May 14, 2010 at 7:55 AM
     
Recommend checking out the new 3.1 Beta if you are having issues. In any case this library is an excellent resource and has saved me tons of time. Sure I've encountered an issue here or there but this is an open source project and I'm a developer so 1+1=2 ;-) Don't mind spending 5 minutes here or there to tweak/fix something that has saved me weeks of work.
by machx0r on May 10, 2010 at 6:32 PM
     
For all of those users which can't get this to work - you'll have to download version 3.1, since Facebook API is changed and older versions doesn't work (as they should) with it.
by kipo on May 10, 2010 at 1:34 PM
     
Negative reviews? You have to spend more than 10 minutes trying to make it work. Could be polished on edges, but this library makes FB Graph API easy.
by dblock on May 7, 2010 at 2:29 PM
     
Nothing work I get Could not deserialize data returned from server all over the place older version works much better.
by 4ks on Apr 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM
     
The Connect sample did not work.
by wmild on Apr 1, 2010 at 2:31 PM
     
I think is better tha previous versions, nut though it has made some good changes in the data structures. There are still a lot of bugs. And its static nature is always a problem when FB API occurs. It has helped us a lot though. And anyway thank you for developing this and for free!!! :D
by Hendrys on Mar 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM
     
API is a mess. Can't believe MS endorses this.
by stonstad on Mar 25, 2010 at 6:00 AM
     
Not bad...could be easier but that may be the point. I think it's best to use Silverlight only where necessary and try to keep the rest of your implementation as simple and lightweight as possible... here is a good article on such an implementation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc135987.aspx
by SoundLogic on Mar 21, 2010 at 5:00 PM
     
Needs negative stars on this incomplete "release." Documentation is incoherent, samples are old, outdated, and non-functional. Using the term release is specious. No improvement in samples or documentation since DUMP back in November. Poor value even at "free."
by windev on Mar 18, 2010 at 2:24 AM
     
Lots of great packaging of the calls, but the documentation is very incomplete. Getting up to speed to do more advanced things than "Hello, Facebook" is nearly impossible in a short time.
by jmounce on Mar 16, 2010 at 6:25 AM
     
The documentation is incomplete and the examples are not working with the lastest stable version.
by feibrix on Mar 9, 2010 at 1:31 PM
     
Samples are outdated, documentation is bad, the Silverlight library is not ready for production work, had to revert to using Web library deployed on backend with Silverlight using it through WCF services. From a product officially endorsed by Microsoft for .NET Facebook integration, i expected a lot more integrity and polish. 2 stars because it's the only solution available now, otherwise 1.
by eared on Mar 9, 2010 at 10:20 AM
     
Great work, but would really like to see continuation of the .NET Compact Framework version.
by jaxbot on Feb 28, 2010 at 2:40 PM
     
Very easy to use. The UI specific dlls are a good idea.
by cspritch76 on Feb 24, 2010 at 6:37 PM
     
great! was a good start for me
by thesuraj on Feb 11, 2010 at 3:45 PM
     
Only asynchronous methods available? Had to build myself from source to get synchronous methods. The release has been build as silverlight solution.
by tlaukkan on Feb 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM